In Sir Philip Sidney’s poem, “Thou Blind Man’s Mark”, Sidney
portrays a man who obsesses over desire, but holds an irritated and unfulfilled
attitude towards it, viewing the destruction of desire to be a well-deserved compensation;
this attitude is articulated through parallel structure, anaphora, and repetition.
The first line of the poem refers to the object of the
narrator’s desire as it is referred to as “Thou blind man’s mark, thou fool’s
self-chosen snare”. The author purposely chooses to use “blind man” and “fool” to
exaggerate the type of man who goes after desire, there is a bitter tone in
that the author views this person as imprudent and so oblivious that he may as
well be blind. The use of the word “snare” helps capture the predatory nature of
catching desire. The frustration that the narrator has with desire is evident
in his diction as he calls the thing that he desires the “Band of all evils, cradle
of causeless care”. The alliteration with the “c” consonants adds to his exasperation
with the senselessness of the characteristics of what (or the actions of whom) he desires. Repetition with words
such as “desire” and “too long” reiterates the narrator’s unsatisfied feeling
towards his situation.
Towards the end of the poem, Sidney begins to use an
anaphora by staring each line with “In vain thou”, which basically implies the
words to no purpose or unsuccessfully. The repeated uttering of the word “vain”
shows the narrator’s now shifting attitude that his efforts to seek desire have
served no purpose as he is unsuccessful time after time. Beginning in the third to last line to the end
of the poem, the audience sees a more firm and consistent attitude toward
desire. The narrator believes that he has taken a benefit out of this
experience through learning a lesson in the line, “For virtue hath this better lesson
taught—“, and the dash puts an additional emphasis on the two lines following
it. These final two lines conclude his complex attitude toward desire by
pointing out that he has earned himself the right to seek his only repayment,
which is to destroy desire.
Throughout the entire poem, Sidney uses poetic devices to
capture the narrator’s conflicting view towards desire in that he is obsessed but
simultaneously frustrated and exhausted from aspiring towards it. The author
ends the poem with what the narrator views as his only repayment which is to
destroy the thing that he has been so infatuated over, the thing that he digresses about
for the entire length of the poem. The ending is very cynical and ironic.
Reflection:
Reflection:
The
mere act of thinking about writing the poetry essay felt extremely taxing and
strenuous. I was dreading it. It felt like a looming storm that would either
hit me head on or pass me by completely. Another words, I thought I would both
find the complexity and completely understand how the poetic devices convey the
attitude of the speaker or completely misinterpret the poem and lack any sort
of nuanced understanding. In reality, after “norming” the sample essays and
discussing them in class, my essay can only be regarded as mediocre at
best. The complexity, however, wasn’t
completely disregarded. I made a conscious effort to address it in my essay,
for instance, in the last paragraph I write, “The author ends the poem with what the narrator views as his only
repayment which is to destroy the thing that he has been so infatuated over,
the thing that he digresses about for the entire length of the poem. The ending
is very cynical and ironic”. There is a feeling of contradictory attitudes
from the narrator in my explanation, which addresses the complexity. The other
aspects that strengthened my essay were identifying the correct connotation of
the word “vain” as futile or pointless as well as identifying the significance
of the alliteration, repetition, parallel structure, punctuation (dash), and anaphora. I consider my essay to be a five as it is evidently "a plausible reading" of the poem and contains a "superficial" analysis of the attitude and the poetic devices.
Looking
at the flaws in my essay, I can immediately see that it lacks the
personification of desire. Also, I interpret that the narrator is irritated by
desire because he is unsuccessful in his pursuits. This is far too safe and
predictable of an interpretation. A higher scoring essay would have addressed
the fact that the narrator refers to desire like a person and demonizes it by
showing how desire corrupts people and furthermore, is single-handedly responsible
for all human suffering and self-destruction. I also failed to acknowledge that
this poem is in fact a sonnet and subsequently failed to identify the structure
of a sonnet with the Octave, the Volta, and the Sestet. A well-written essay
would have addressed the tone shift starting with the line “Desire, desire!” as
the start of the Volta or turn in the sonnet and the first eight lines as the
Octave or obstacle that the writer is presenting. In addition, addressing how
the author turns the attention back to the speaker in the last two lines of the
sonnet in the Sestet (solution) would have made for a very thorough analysis of the
sonnet.
In
order to improve my poetry essays in the future, I will continue to ask myself
guiding questions while close reading the poem (similar to the prose passage
essay). My questions will include the following: What type of poem is this?
What is the structure of this type of poem? What is the significance of a
certain meter or rhyme scheme? Are there
details that contradict each other to show contrast? What kind of poetic
devices are being used so that it affects mood and tone? And if all else fails,
how does the author use diction and syntax to create meaning?
I will also continue with my goal of staying
organized and efficient in the prewriting and close reading stages of my 40
minutes, utilizing a full ten minutes to plan out my essay. My last goal will
be more specific to analyzing poetry, as there are certain pieces of prior
knowledge that I am significantly lacking. I will make a conscious effort to familiarize myself with the various poetry forms, the different types of
meter and rhyme schemes, and the various poetic devices.
No comments:
Post a Comment